Whether the WSJ reporter was a CIA asset or not, Washington had no qualms when pursuing another publisher for the same activities
While the jury remains out as to whether Evan Gershkovich, the Wall Street Journal reporter who was arrested last year in Russia for espionage, is smart, it goes without saying that he is most definitely ballsy.
For those just getting up to speed on the latest Spy vs Spy episode, Gershkovich, 32, was nabbed inside a restaurant in the Russian city of Ekaterinburg as he was passed classified data on Russia’s defense industry. What makes Gershkovich particularly ‘ballsy’ in this case is that the suspected espionage happened smack in the middle of Russia’s special military operation against Ukraine, and when Moscow’s domestic security apparatus is operating on high alert, 24/7. Add to that the exploding rates of patriotism and pro-Putin pledges and the Motherland makes the most fatal Bond girl resemble a ditzy blonde at happy hour (no offense to ditzy blondes, of course). In other words, what on earth was the young reporter thinking as he waltzed into a war-zone, sniffing around in Russia’s military drawer?
While we will never know the exact answer to that question, the Russian opposition, in perfect lockstep with Western liberals, quickly jumped to the defense of the cocky Gershkovich, who was released last week as part of a historic prisoner exchange between Russia and the West. They say the young man was really (really!) NOT part of some CIA Mockingbird thing, but rather was hoodwinked by those dastardly Russians into accepting the classified data when all he really wanted to do was write an innocent piece of investigative journalism.
Thanks to the marvel of modern technology, however, there is compelling evidence to show that Gershkovich had done an admirable job of incriminating himself. Just seconds before Russian operatives swooped in to make their arrest, the reporter is heard reassuring the official from the Russian defense industry that the necessary precautions have been taken to prevent any possible, you know, ‘misunderstandings.’
“We won’t even write that we saw the documents,” he said.
Then, sinking deeper into the judicial morass, he said in suspiciously impressive Russian, “we won’t be suspected of gathering [info]and no-one will be suspected of leaking [it].” That slick remark is followed by Gershkovich telling his source that he wanted him to “leave [the data]at home…this is only an interview.”
The clinch moment came as he attempted to conceal what appears to have been a flash drive containing the coveted data and just moments before being frog-marched out of the restaurant. Commenting on the incident, the Kremlin said the journalist had been “caught red-handed,” while Russia’s Investigative Committee claimed he had engaged in espionage on behalf of the US intelligence community. Whether that is true, false, or some murky middle place in this spy thriller, we will probably never know for sure. There remains the distinct possibility, however, that Russia had hopes of classifying the snooping journalist, a mere ‘pawn’ in the great game, as a valuable chess piece with an eye towards future prison exchanges.
But back to the original question: what was the nervy Gershkovich thinking? I mean, all of this sounds very familiar, doesn’t it? The West hotly pursued an Australian journalist named Julian Assange around the world for about 15 years for engaging in approximately the same criminal activities. That chase came to an anticlimactic end in June when the founder of WikiLeaks, the notorious publisher of leaked documents, agreed to plead guilty to a single charge under the Espionage Act in order to secure his long-sought freedom.
While many in Washington celebrated Assange’s release, others expressed outright indignation.
Former Republican vice-president and ex-CIA chief Mike Pence, for example, described Assange’s plea deal as “a miscarriage of justice [that]dishonors the service and sacrifice of the men and women of our armed forces and their families.”
“Julian Assange endangered the lives of our troops in a time of war and should have been prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,” Pence howled, before reaching a fist-pounding crescendo: “There should be no plea deals to avoid prison for anyone that endangers the security of our military or the national security of the United States. Ever.”
It may require little persuasion to suggest that Mr Pence would have a completely different attitude towards a young journalist named Evan Gershkovich, who, like Mr Assange under different circumstances, may have “endangered the lives of troops in a time of war.”
