Concern around Tua Tagovailoa’s health is understandable. But quitting football means athletes must confront life without a sport often crucial to their identity
Football is one of the most violent sports in the world – a fact that is both its downfall and allure. As players, we are acutely aware of the risks we take every time we step on to the field. And if we aren’t, it’s often a chosen ignorance, a conscious decision to embrace the reckless freedom that the sport demands. I don’t know a single teammate from my career in the NFL or college who doesn’t suffer daily pain from their playing days. Yet, that pain often brings back memories of treasured moments – the locker room camaraderie, the weight room grind and the battles on the field. In the NFL, these injuries can feel like medals of honor, testaments to having survived a game that those who have not played it cannot truly fathom. Despite the suffering, most of us continue to play the game we love while we still can, accepting the consequences of the life we’ve chosen. Few regret it, though some do. And tragically, some lose their lives too soon because of it. But what happens when the risk finally outweighs the reward?
The recent discussion around the health of Miami Dolphins quarterback Tua Tagovailoa have reopened a familiar debate: when is it time for a player to walk away? After his third documented concussion in two years, many in the football world urged Tua to retire, to “shut it down”. People point out that he has already made $73m – enough to set up the 26-year-old and his family for life. Why risk his health for a job that could kill him? But walking away isn’t a simple choice; it’s a deeply personal reckoning that goes beyond the physical.
RK Russell is a former NFL player for the Dallas Cowboys and Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
